CFTC finalizes forex rules: leverage reduced to 1:50

19 Comments

The CFTC has finally released its final regulations concerning off-exchange retail foreign currency transactions. The rules implement provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008, which, together, provide the CFTC with broad authority to register and regulate entities wishing to serve as counterparties to, or to intermediate, retail foreign exchange (forex) transactions. The final rules become effective October 18, 2010.

Most importantly these rules further reduce the leverage which can be offered by US forex brokers to 1:50 and 1:20 on majors and minors respectively. To those with short memory – it’s not the first time CFTC reduces forex leverage as back in May 2009 the leverage was reduced from 1:400 to 1:100.

IBs however were saved, at least for now, as IBs can be guaranteed by a certain broker or remain independent. This however goes to show you that with time CFTC will probably require all IBs to become guaranteed as CFTC seem to deliver its blows in small portions.

An interesting aspect that I think went unnoticed is that SEC/FINRA brokers (like Citi, Deutsche, etc) can keep offering retail forex trading regardless of these regulations, therefore keeping the 1:100 leverage and become more attractive to forex traders than CFTC forex brokers (like FXCM, IBFX, etc).

“These rules of the road will help protect the American public in the largest area of retail fraud that the CFTC oversees: retail foreign exchange,” CFTC Chairman Gary Gensler said. “All CFTC registrants involved in soliciting and selling retail forex contracts to consumers will now have to comply with rules to protect the investing public. This is also the first final rule that the Commission has published to implement the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. We look forward to publishing additional rules to protect the American public.”

If Mr. Gensler thinks that making the US forex industry uncompetitive is making the American public safer then let’s see where the US money will be deposited from now on. I bet that most of it will go offshore. In Japan the leverage was reduced to 1:50 exactly a month ago and there are reports of a huge drop in volumes (nothing not expected) meaning that brokers are now making less from same number of transactions/traders which will necessarily lead some of them to go out of business.

Read more here and here.


cftc final forex rules

TAGS: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

19 Comments on this post

Trackbacks

  1. Jack Lamont said:

    When i click on the release i see nothing about the leverage – where is that?

    August 31st, 2010 at 8:49 am
  2. Asaf said:

    As always it looks like the CFTC has left a few holes in the ruling to enable the retail brokers to operate the way they operate today by allowing them to register as SEC regulated broker and I also didn’t see any restrictions to offer retail trading by a major affiliate which is not registered CFTC broker like FXCM-UK, FXDD-Malta, Forex.com-UK and others.

    So if had to sum this up I would say that there are new rules but no change – congrats to all!!!

    – Asaf.

    August 31st, 2010 at 9:03 am
  3. Michael Greenberg said:

    Right upper corner on CFTC’s website, “Final Rule Regarding Retail Foreign Exchange Transactions” under Related Links. It’s embedded on my website anyway.

    August 31st, 2010 at 9:29 am
  4. Michael Greenberg said:

    LOL, well, I don’t think they can or will limit affiliates. After all, FXCM can create a whole independent offshore company which won’t be affiliate and still will be able to accept clients, so why would they? But then again, why would CFTC make any rules that make sense.

    August 31st, 2010 at 9:31 am
  5. Asaf said:

    The original proposal had restricted any entity which is not regulated by the CFTC from offering trading for US customers which meant that FXCM-UK and other affiliates were not support to be permitted to offer trading for US customers unless they are also registered by the CFTC. I either didn’t understand the FAQ or they have waived that requirement.

    I wonder if their rules for CTAs has passed – do you know if they have uploaded the complete document?

    In any way this is great news to the forex industry in the US which can and will continue to operate in the same way it does today.

    – Asaf.

    August 31st, 2010 at 9:56 am
  6. Jack Lamont said:

    I see the linkl – http://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/pr5883-10.html – but in the link i dont see a specific mention of leverage. am i blind?

    August 31st, 2010 at 11:03 am
  7. Michael Greenberg said:

    on the right: “Questions and Answers Regarding Final Retail Foreign Exchange Rule” – http://www.cftc.gov/ucm/groups/public/@newsroom/documents/file/forexfinalrule_qa.pdf

    “The proposed 10 to 1 leverage restriction has been replaced with a mechanism whereby the Commission sets
    parameters (the release specifies a minimum 2 percent security deposit in the case of major currencies and 5 percent
    of the notional value of the transaction for all other currencies) and periodically reviews the appropriateness of those
    parameters. “

    August 31st, 2010 at 11:09 am
  8. Michael Greenberg said:

    not sure.. check their QA: http://www.cftc.gov/ucm/groups/public/@newsroom/documents/file/forexfinalrule_qa.pdf
    if it’s not there i guess it was dropped

    August 31st, 2010 at 11:11 am
  9. Lup said:

    Hello,

    Just want to share what I consider the most important part of the CFTC release:

    “These rules of the road will help protect the American public in the largest area of retail fraud that the CFTC oversees: retail foreign exchange,” CFTC Chairman Gary Gensler said. “All CFTC registrants involved in soliciting and selling retail forex contracts to consumers will now have to comply with rules to protect the investing public. This is also the first final rule that the Commission has published to implement the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. We look forward to publishing additional rules to protect the American public.”

    The whole US industry must do better to protect their customers – afterall, it is the largest area of retail fraud that the CFTC oversees. A huge step was taken by the CFTC in having everyone registered. This is excellent news indeed – as the rules have legitimized the retail forex industry.

    Next step: get the attorneys ready, CFDs have a shot to be traded in the US – those on exchange future contracts are way too large and expensive for retail to trade.

    August 31st, 2010 at 12:00 pm
  10. James said:

    @Asaf, a non-US broker can’t solicit you. YOU CAN contact them and open an account if they accept US Citizens(some can’t). I’ve had accounts on FXDD Malta(200:1) and GOMarkets AUS(500:1) with no problems at all.

    August 31st, 2010 at 8:04 pm
  11. Rob Booker said:

    Asaf,

    The requirement that a counterparty to retail fx transactions be a U.S. financial institution has not changed. That is not part of the CFTC regs that were published today, but rather part of the ‘‘Dodd-Frank
    Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act’’ – the finreg that everyone has been talking about.

    Section 742(c)(1)(A) of that Act, which is now law, requires that any counterparty that offers retail fx to customers be a U.S. financial institution:

    http://screencast.com/t/NGU2MjYxZTI

    It does so by amending the CRA (the CFTC Reauthorization Act of 2008).

    I know the paper trail on this stuff is ridiculously difficult to navigate, but that’s where you’re hearing about the requirement.

    Happy trading,

    Rob

    August 31st, 2010 at 8:44 pm
  12. Marc said:

    I’m still unclear as to whether the new rules will allow US traders to continue to trade at “foreign” FCM’s like FXCM Ltd (UK) and/or Dukascopy (Switzerland). Can someone knowledgeable please comment on whether this will still be allowed?

    August 31st, 2010 at 10:23 pm
  13. Michael Greenberg said:

    @Rob, I don’t think you are right. It’s obvious that any local regulation will mention only local counterparties as those which are able to accept local clients. I suppose FSA (and MiFID) do the same. It is however unclear (call it a grey area) if you wish whether US clients can open accounts with foreign brokers. Those brokers probably will not actively solicit US clients (as James below mentioned) but for now nothing stops them from accepting them.

    Think of it this way: are US brokers forbidden from accepting non-US clients?

    September 1st, 2010 at 1:08 am
  14. Lup said:

    “Think of it this way: are US brokers forbidden from accepting non-US clients?”

    Even if a loophole, I don’t think any firm will like to take that risk – if you look around the world, Japan to 50:1 then in year even lower. Look at the 7 dealers thrown out of that little island off Africa, and then go to Europe and see the pressure that have placed on one of the biggest retail forex dealer. The spirit of the rule- US clients stay in the US- will be respected, cause the consequences can be severe.

    September 1st, 2010 at 3:14 am
  15. Adil Siddiqui said:

    there is a way round, the US regulated firm can become an IB of the overseas firm..?

    September 1st, 2010 at 4:34 am
  16. Asaf said:

    Rob,

    You are right,

    We checked with our lawyer and we also talked to a few brokers and once the bill passes every forex counter party that offers trading for US customers would have to register with the CFTC which means that FXCM-UK and others will not be able to offer Forex to US customers unless they are regulated and therefore have the leverage and hedging requirements.

    @Adill – this is incorrect because as an IB you have to be registered with the CFTC and be a member of the NFA and you can only refer customers to an approved counter party or to a counter party that is not required to be regulated. The only loophole is if they become an IB to a bank like Citi and DBFX.

    – Asaf.

    September 1st, 2010 at 9:32 am
  17. Rob Booker said:

    Michael, oh, how I wish that were the case.

    I’ve been talking to the CFTC today as well, and the NFA, and the compliance departments at some dealers, and the story is the same: it appears that the following are true:

    1. The NFA already believes that it is innappropriate, perhaps even illegal, for a foreign FCM to accept a US client for retail forex. We know that’s happening, of course, and the NFA has been powerless to do anything about it in the absence of any law or rule from the CFTC.

    2. If a foreign company with NO U.S. affiliate accepted retail forex clients from the U.S, it would be very difficult for the CFTC to pursue an action against such a company. Of course, the CFTC could go to the United States District Court (federal court) and file a lawsuit, but even after a judgment was entered against a foreign company, how are they going to collect?

    3. If a foreign company WITH a U.S. affiliate continues to accept clients from the U.S. then the CFTC could sue, and perhaps punish the U.S. affiliate, especially if the U.S. affiliate was a holding company of the foreign firm, or a part owner of the foreign firm.

    4. The Dodd-Frank Act does not go into effect until July of next year. It’s possible that the restriction on opening accounts at foreign brokers will not go into effect until then.

    5. The CFTC may argue that the new rules require registration for RFEDs, and they will sue in federal court any entity that accepts new accounts (or any accounts) from U.S. clients, effective October 18, 2010. I’m not sure they can prove they have the jurisdiction to do this, but I’m pretty sure it’s going to be an urgent matter that they attend to promptly. They would not go through all the trouble of having the Dodd-Frank act language put in, and issuing new rules, only to have a GIANT loophole.

    6. The CFTC is probably not going to sue individuals in the U.S. who open up foreign retail forex accounts, even after it’s illegal. But who would want to risk it?

    In short, there is a massive giant lack of clarity on this issue. I’ve been promised that by tomorrow (Thursday, Sept 2) the CFTC will get back to me on how they plan to handle these questions above. I’ll post here again and tell you what I find out.

    Happy (regulated) trading!

    Rob Booker

    September 1st, 2010 at 9:44 pm
  18. Michael Greenberg said:

    Hi Rob,

    Many thanks for posting this detailed comment.

    All I can say is repeat what I wrote in this post: http://site13.miydim.com/cftcs-new-rules-will-foreign-brokers-accept-us-clients/ – I doubt CFTC will go after foreign brokers who have no presence in the US.
    I’m absolutely sure that CFTC won’t go after US traders themselves as well because a. it’s costly and ineffective b. US authorities aren’t going after US residents who gamble online even though it’s illegal so I very much doubt they’ll go after forex traders.

    Waiting for your new comments.

    September 2nd, 2010 at 12:53 am
  19. Warren said:

    @JAMES….PLZ HELP!!!!….I’ve been trying to open an account with GOMARKETS, btu Ilive in TX and teh notaries in TX will not “certify” any copy of a public record. What document did you send in with your application, in order to get your accout approved and opened!!! PLZ e-mail me: kwvending@hotmail.com

    Thanks in advance!!!!!

    September 2nd, 2010 at 12:16 pm
zulu trade ava fx

Note: Copyright © 2011 Forex Magnates. All rights reserved.

All materials contained on this site are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of Forex Magnates. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content. All information on this page is subject to change. The use of this website constitutes acceptance of our user agreement. Please read our privacy policy and legal disclaimer. Trading foreign exchange on margin carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. The high degree of leverage can work against you as well as for you.Before deciding to trade foreign exchange you should carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience and risk appetite. The possibility exists that you could sustain a loss of some or all of your initial investment and therefore you should not invest money that you cannot afford to lose. You should be aware of all the risks associated with foreign exchange trading and seek advice from an independent financial advisor if you have any doubts.

Opinions expressed at Forex Magnates are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Forex Magnates or its management. Forex Magnates has not verified the accuracy or basis-in-fact of any claim or statement made by any independent author: errors and Omissions may occur. Any opinions, news, research, analyses, prices or other information contained on this website, by Forex Magnates, its employees, partners or contributors, is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. Forex Magnates will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to, any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information.

©2011 "Forex Magnates Inc. - Home of the Forex Elite" All Rights Reserved.


Fatal error: Call to undefined function hv_get_random_banner() in /home/forexmag/public_html/wp-content/themes/forex_magnates/footer.php on line 52