<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New location for the CFTC&#039;s retail forex requirements document</title>
	<atom:link href="http://forexmagnates.com/cftc-made-the-retail-forex-requirements-document-disappear-but-here-it-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://forexmagnates.com/cftc-made-the-retail-forex-requirements-document-disappear-but-here-it-is/</link>
	<description>Forex Magnates is the home of the Forex Elite providing up to date industry news coverage, commentary and scoops</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:10:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://forexmagnates.com/cftc-made-the-retail-forex-requirements-document-disappear-but-here-it-is/#comment-5140</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 05:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forexmagnates.com/?p=2966#comment-5140</guid>
		<description>this proposal is down right atrocious as this market is perfectly efficient !
judging from the comments, message board responses, emails, and conversations i have had, this tweak in the system is perceived as a very very significant tweak!

Americans are getting substantially frustrated and at the verge of rioting with all the restrictions and limitations on our so called &#039;Free markets&quot;...i mean come on ! if its not broken, what the hell are you trying to fix???

i have already started searching for possible alternatives around this 10:1 proposal if it is passed, and by the look of things it will not be good for the US market, as many many investors would agree!!..

how about even a 50:1???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this proposal is down right atrocious as this market is perfectly efficient !<br />
judging from the comments, message board responses, emails, and conversations i have had, this tweak in the system is perceived as a very very significant tweak!</p>
<p>Americans are getting substantially frustrated and at the verge of rioting with all the restrictions and limitations on our so called &#8216;Free markets&#8221;&#8230;i mean come on ! if its not broken, what the hell are you trying to fix???</p>
<p>i have already started searching for possible alternatives around this 10:1 proposal if it is passed, and by the look of things it will not be good for the US market, as many many investors would agree!!..</p>
<p>how about even a 50:1???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hunt</title>
		<link>http://forexmagnates.com/cftc-made-the-retail-forex-requirements-document-disappear-but-here-it-is/#comment-5139</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forexmagnates.com/?p=2966#comment-5139</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael,

I can&#039;t claim to have read every word in both versions of the proposals, but as I pointed out in my post, I don&#039;t believe the new document is abridged, it just uses 3 columns of smaller print instead of the single column in the original.

If anyone would like to check this for themselves, both versions are now available for download from the above link.

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael,</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t claim to have read every word in both versions of the proposals, but as I pointed out in my post, I don&#8217;t believe the new document is abridged, it just uses 3 columns of smaller print instead of the single column in the original.</p>
<p>If anyone would like to check this for themselves, both versions are now available for download from the above link.</p>
<p>Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Greenberg</title>
		<link>http://forexmagnates.com/cftc-made-the-retail-forex-requirements-document-disappear-but-here-it-is/#comment-5138</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Greenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forexmagnates.com/?p=2966#comment-5138</guid>
		<description>Hi Jim, actually it is: the new document you point at is 50 pages long abridged version of the original 193 pages document.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jim, actually it is: the new document you point at is 50 pages long abridged version of the original 193 pages document.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hunt</title>
		<link>http://forexmagnates.com/cftc-made-the-retail-forex-requirements-document-disappear-but-here-it-is/#comment-5137</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forexmagnates.com/?p=2966#comment-5137</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael,

This is not in fact quite as sinister as it sounds. For full detail please see:

http://trading-gurus.com/new-location-for-cftc-10-to-1-leverage-proposals/

Cheers,

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael,</p>
<p>This is not in fact quite as sinister as it sounds. For full detail please see:</p>
<p><a href="http://trading-gurus.com/new-location-for-cftc-10-to-1-leverage-proposals/" rel="nofollow">http://trading-gurus.com/new-location-for-cftc-10-to-1-leverage-proposals/</a></p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

