<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Misleading PRs, FXDD test case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://forexmagnates.com/misleading-prs-fxdd-test-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://forexmagnates.com/misleading-prs-fxdd-test-case/</link>
	<description>Forex Magnates is the home of the Forex Elite providing up to date industry news coverage, commentary and scoops</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:44:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asaf</title>
		<link>http://forexmagnates.com/misleading-prs-fxdd-test-case/#comment-5395</link>
		<dc:creator>Asaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 11:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forexmagnates.com/?p=4343#comment-5395</guid>
		<description>Ric,

I don&#039;t understand why you choose to pick a fight and insult me instead of having a discussion but regardless.

IBFX was charged with C.R.2-36(b)(1) - CHEAT, DEFRAUD, DECEIVE FOREX CUSTOMERS and if you read the document you&#039;d see that they have been charged for that section  &quot;for the use of deficient promotional material by non-Member solicitors&quot; which is a pretty bad practice that I am sure they have corrected it.

Anyway, my point was not to say something bad about IBFX, they are are great broker and I have an account with them for more than 2 years now and am very happy. My point was that these kind of PR is not helping and has the potential to backfire - that&#039;s all.

-- Asaf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ric,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand why you choose to pick a fight and insult me instead of having a discussion but regardless.</p>
<p>IBFX was charged with C.R.2-36(b)(1) &#8211; CHEAT, DEFRAUD, DECEIVE FOREX CUSTOMERS and if you read the document you&#8217;d see that they have been charged for that section  &#8220;for the use of deficient promotional material by non-Member solicitors&#8221; which is a pretty bad practice that I am sure they have corrected it.</p>
<p>Anyway, my point was not to say something bad about IBFX, they are are great broker and I have an account with them for more than 2 years now and am very happy. My point was that these kind of PR is not helping and has the potential to backfire &#8211; that&#8217;s all.</p>
<p>&#8211; Asaf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ric</title>
		<link>http://forexmagnates.com/misleading-prs-fxdd-test-case/#comment-5394</link>
		<dc:creator>Ric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 23:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forexmagnates.com/?p=4343#comment-5394</guid>
		<description>Asaf.  That is not what the ibfx complaint was about at all. It had nothing to do with, &quot; CHEAT, DEFRAUD, DECEIVE FOREX CUSTOMERS.&quot;

This from the link YOU posted:  COMPLAINT:


On July 27, 2009, NFA issued a Complaint charging Interbank with failure to develop and implement an adequate AML program; failure to adequately supervise the electronic trading system; use of deficient promotional material by non-Member solicitors; and failure to adequately supervise the solicitation of non-Member solicitors. The Complaint also charged Crosland and Albretsen with failure to supervise.

In short you are either troll liar, or someone with sour grapes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asaf.  That is not what the ibfx complaint was about at all. It had nothing to do with, &#8221; CHEAT, DEFRAUD, DECEIVE FOREX CUSTOMERS.&#8221;</p>
<p>This from the link YOU posted:  COMPLAINT:</p>
<p>On July 27, 2009, NFA issued a Complaint charging Interbank with failure to develop and implement an adequate AML program; failure to adequately supervise the electronic trading system; use of deficient promotional material by non-Member solicitors; and failure to adequately supervise the solicitation of non-Member solicitors. The Complaint also charged Crosland and Albretsen with failure to supervise.</p>
<p>In short you are either troll liar, or someone with sour grapes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asaf</title>
		<link>http://forexmagnates.com/misleading-prs-fxdd-test-case/#comment-5393</link>
		<dc:creator>Asaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 13:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forexmagnates.com/?p=4343#comment-5393</guid>
		<description>In my opinion this PR can backfire big time for them and it doesn&#039;t do them a lot of good.

FXDD was just recently completed the NFA registration and I don&#039;t believe they have been audited yet so in case the NFA does find something when they are going to be audited such PR would probably resurface.

Just as a comparison - IBFX which were the first to issue these statements was also charged by the NFA for &quot;CHEAT, DEFRAUD, DECEIVE FOREX CUSTOMERS&quot; about a year ago - http://www.nfa.futures.org/basicnet/Case.aspx?entityid=0326091&amp;case=09BCC00022&amp;contrib=NFA

So my 2 cents is to spend less on PR and more on being a decent broker even if it means cutting back on revenue.

-- Asaf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion this PR can backfire big time for them and it doesn&#8217;t do them a lot of good.</p>
<p>FXDD was just recently completed the NFA registration and I don&#8217;t believe they have been audited yet so in case the NFA does find something when they are going to be audited such PR would probably resurface.</p>
<p>Just as a comparison &#8211; IBFX which were the first to issue these statements was also charged by the NFA for &#8220;CHEAT, DEFRAUD, DECEIVE FOREX CUSTOMERS&#8221; about a year ago &#8211; <a href="http://www.nfa.futures.org/basicnet/Case.aspx?entityid=0326091&#038;case=09BCC00022&#038;contrib=NFA" rel="nofollow">http://www.nfa.futures.org/basicnet/Case.aspx?entityid=0326091&#038;case=09BCC00022&#038;contrib=NFA</a></p>
<p>So my 2 cents is to spend less on PR and more on being a decent broker even if it means cutting back on revenue.</p>
<p>&#8211; Asaf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

