Open letter to the NFA asking for clarifications regarding the latest regulatory requirements (will appreciate your comment):

3 Comments

I’m going to send this tomorrow to Edward Dasso, Managing Director, Compliance and Lauren Brinati, Senior Manager, Compliance.

Will appreciate anyone’s feed back or comments.

Thanks,
Michael

Dear Edward,

My name is Michael Greenberg and I work for Forex software provider ParagonEX (www.paragonex.com).

Having read the new regulation requirements and the attached explanation we, as well as several brokers, software developers and traders, encountered a few points which require further clarification in order for us to adequately program our software and trading modules.

Specifically we are concerned with the Offsetting Transactions wording: “New Compliance Rule 2-43(b) requires an FDM to offset positions in a customer account on a first-in, first-out basis, thereby prohibiting a trading practice commonly referred to as “hedging.” A customer may, however, direct the FDM to offset same-size transactions even if there are older transactions of a different size.”

First of all, we are concerned whether the first-in, first-out basis relates only to the hedging activity (simple buy/sell orders) or does it relate to other types of orders, for instance Trailing Stop Loss/Buy Orders or Limit Orders? These orders typically serve as a protection for the traders against volatile market moves and therefore should remain as an option for client to use them.

Secondly, we are concerned whether when “simple” buy/sell orders are executed together with more “sophisticated” Trailing or Limit orders, whether the offset of these orders has to happen on the first-in, first-out basis as well?
For instance, if a trader bought 1 lot of EURUSD with simple stop loss order and then bought another lot with trailing stop order – when the market triggers the trailing stop loss will the client need to offset the “simple” order first and then the more sophisticated one or can he offset the second one first because it’s a different type of order and has nothing to do with hedging?

Thirdly, could please clarify what does “allow customers to direct the FDM offset same-size transactions” mean in the following sentence: “NFA believes that the potential for misuse outweighs any perceived benefits from allowing customers to carry long and short positions in the same currency in the same account. Therefore, Compliance Rule 2-43(b) bans the practice and requires FDMs to offset positions on a first-in, first-out basis (FIFO). It does, however, allow customers to direct the FDM to offset same-size transactions.”
Does that allow customers to close their open positions or does that allow individual offsetting of positions of different sizes regardless of the date the position was taken? Does that mean that if a customer opens a 1 lot position and then an additional 1.1 lot position in the same currency pair and in the same direction (long/short) they are able to close the 1.1 lot first?

We look forward to your reply.

Best Regards,
Michael

TAGS: , , , , ,
More information on this subject is found in the latest Forex Magnates Quarterly Industry Report

3 Comments on this post

Trackbacks

  1. US Metaquotes brokers are in stress: will Metaquotes supply the NFA FIFO patch on time? | Forex Magnates wrote:

    [...] you have been following my posts I reported that NFA extended its FIFO (first-in, first-out) requirements deadline to July 31st, 2009. This [...]

    May 12th, 2009 at 5:52 am
  1. Michael Greenberg said:

    Even though I was yet to receive any answer from the NFA (surprise, surprise) I was able however to understand a bit better the reason for the one of the requirements: least the Anti- Hedging one and the heated debate in Forex forums following it.
    While hedging, as allowed by some avid brokers means opening simultaneously exactly the same position once long and once short, and with same stop losses/take profits in one click, essentially eliminates any upside there are other strategies which allow opening reverse positions but not necessarily simultaneously and with different stop losses and take profits or even limit orders and trailing stops.
    I believe that NFA were essentially trying to eliminate only the former practice by avid brokers and were right in their thinking. However the only way they found to deal with this issue was to ban all types of reverse deals, and that’s wrong.

    Example of a discussion where the author took only the first practice into consideration but omitted others is here: http://www.learningmarkets.com/index.php/200905052088/News-Feed/News-Feed/the-new-nfa-rules-wont-stop-hedgers.html
    The problem is that he vigorously pickets for only one side of the coin, what about the other(s)?

    May 5th, 2009 at 5:49 pm
  2. Michael Greenberg said:

    Looks like NFA does listen to complaints after all:

    http://www.nfa.futures.org/news/newsNotice.asp?ArticleID=2281

    at least they agreed to postpone the FIFO implementation date until July 31st, however it is still not clear what EXACTLY they mean by FIFO.

    May 6th, 2009 at 3:38 am
Mirror Trader Leverate

Note: Copyright © 2011 Forex Magnates. All rights reserved.

All materials contained on this site are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of Forex Magnates. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content. All information on this page is subject to change. The use of this website constitutes acceptance of our user agreement. Please read our privacy policy and legal disclaimer. Trading foreign exchange on margin carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. The high degree of leverage can work against you as well as for you.Before deciding to trade foreign exchange you should carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience and risk appetite. The possibility exists that you could sustain a loss of some or all of your initial investment and therefore you should not invest money that you cannot afford to lose. You should be aware of all the risks associated with foreign exchange trading and seek advice from an independent financial advisor if you have any doubts.

Opinions expressed at Forex Magnates are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Forex Magnates or its management. Forex Magnates has not verified the accuracy or basis-in-fact of any claim or statement made by any independent author: errors and Omissions may occur. Any opinions, news, research, analyses, prices or other information contained on this website, by Forex Magnates, its employees, partners or contributors, is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. Forex Magnates will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to, any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information.

©2011 "Forex Magnates Inc. - Home of the Forex Elite" All Rights Reserved.