<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Survivor ’09 – Last US Forex broker standing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://forexmagnates.com/survivor-%e2%80%9909-%e2%80%93-last-us-forex-broker-standing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://forexmagnates.com/survivor-%e2%80%9909-%e2%80%93-last-us-forex-broker-standing/</link>
	<description>Forex Magnates is the home of the Forex Elite providing up to date industry news coverage, commentary and scoops</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:10:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: KatyG</title>
		<link>http://forexmagnates.com/survivor-%e2%80%9909-%e2%80%93-last-us-forex-broker-standing/#comment-4903</link>
		<dc:creator>KatyG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 05:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forexmagnates.com/?p=364#comment-4903</guid>
		<description>Anyone know what happened to TradeView team, they were first sales team for  ODL, Then 1World, then RCG TradeView, then Ikon TradeView now it seems their peddling training classes..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know what happened to TradeView team, they were first sales team for  ODL, Then 1World, then RCG TradeView, then Ikon TradeView now it seems their peddling training classes..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo Mendes</title>
		<link>http://forexmagnates.com/survivor-%e2%80%9909-%e2%80%93-last-us-forex-broker-standing/#comment-4902</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo Mendes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forexmagnates.com/?p=364#comment-4902</guid>
		<description>FXDD Registration pending..........I&#039;ve heard that line for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FXDD Registration pending&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.I&#8217;ve heard that line for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://forexmagnates.com/survivor-%e2%80%9909-%e2%80%93-last-us-forex-broker-standing/#comment-4901</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forexmagnates.com/?p=364#comment-4901</guid>
		<description>To be honest I would just type in Forex broker into google. If it&#039;s not in the top 10 then do not use it. I see so many replies here of how about this? How about that?

Do 30 minutes of research to see if your broker is backed by a fair amount of capital. See if you can find out how many clients they have too.

You might as well just throw your money out the window if you&#039;re not going to use a top forex broker because the bucket shops are just that, bucket shops that have no reason to not rip you off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest I would just type in Forex broker into google. If it&#8217;s not in the top 10 then do not use it. I see so many replies here of how about this? How about that?</p>
<p>Do 30 minutes of research to see if your broker is backed by a fair amount of capital. See if you can find out how many clients they have too.</p>
<p>You might as well just throw your money out the window if you&#8217;re not going to use a top forex broker because the bucket shops are just that, bucket shops that have no reason to not rip you off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John P</title>
		<link>http://forexmagnates.com/survivor-%e2%80%9909-%e2%80%93-last-us-forex-broker-standing/#comment-4900</link>
		<dc:creator>John P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 02:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forexmagnates.com/?p=364#comment-4900</guid>
		<description>What about MG Forex?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about MG Forex?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgy</title>
		<link>http://forexmagnates.com/survivor-%e2%80%9909-%e2%80%93-last-us-forex-broker-standing/#comment-4899</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forexmagnates.com/?p=364#comment-4899</guid>
		<description>From a business cycle perspective this is all very common. A new market sector is identified by entrepreneur&#039;s (retail FX) and they are quickly able to take advantage of it. Bigger players (such as banks in FX) don&#039;t see the possibilities initially in these markets because they already have volume and high profit margins. Later as the new sector becomes established there tends to be an awakening by the big players that they better get a share of it. This sparks the consolidation process and return to size normally associated with most industries.

Business on the Internet has only recently been attractive to big business, after security, payment and bandwidth issues had been sorted, big business is now able to work in economies of scale and have worked out the mix between customer service, sales and as a marketing &amp; brand management tool.

I also recall when small entrepreneur&#039;s were able to dominate google adwords and it took ages before big business was able to get there heads around it and do more than just out bid small entrepreneur&#039;s.

I believe what you are writing about is this process working now and it will be interesting to see how it plays out over coming months. Certainly the NFA is anxious to complete it and wipe their hands of the small players that have annoyed them so much over the last 7 years. However by changing the rules completely I cant help but wonder at that forces at work behind all this. Have the yapping public managed to enter and destroy a market niche in the US within such a short space of time. I for one am intrigued to see the development in coming months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a business cycle perspective this is all very common. A new market sector is identified by entrepreneur&#8217;s (retail FX) and they are quickly able to take advantage of it. Bigger players (such as banks in FX) don&#8217;t see the possibilities initially in these markets because they already have volume and high profit margins. Later as the new sector becomes established there tends to be an awakening by the big players that they better get a share of it. This sparks the consolidation process and return to size normally associated with most industries.</p>
<p>Business on the Internet has only recently been attractive to big business, after security, payment and bandwidth issues had been sorted, big business is now able to work in economies of scale and have worked out the mix between customer service, sales and as a marketing &amp; brand management tool.</p>
<p>I also recall when small entrepreneur&#8217;s were able to dominate google adwords and it took ages before big business was able to get there heads around it and do more than just out bid small entrepreneur&#8217;s.</p>
<p>I believe what you are writing about is this process working now and it will be interesting to see how it plays out over coming months. Certainly the NFA is anxious to complete it and wipe their hands of the small players that have annoyed them so much over the last 7 years. However by changing the rules completely I cant help but wonder at that forces at work behind all this. Have the yapping public managed to enter and destroy a market niche in the US within such a short space of time. I for one am intrigued to see the development in coming months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JaneRadriges</title>
		<link>http://forexmagnates.com/survivor-%e2%80%9909-%e2%80%93-last-us-forex-broker-standing/#comment-4898</link>
		<dc:creator>JaneRadriges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forexmagnates.com/?p=364#comment-4898</guid>
		<description>The best information i have found exactly here. Keep going Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best information i have found exactly here. Keep going Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Chairman of CFTC promisses even more stringent regulations to come &#124; Forex Magnates</title>
		<link>http://forexmagnates.com/survivor-%e2%80%9909-%e2%80%93-last-us-forex-broker-standing/#comment-4897</link>
		<dc:creator>New Chairman of CFTC promisses even more stringent regulations to come &#124; Forex Magnates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 12:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forexmagnates.com/?p=364#comment-4897</guid>
		<description>[...] and the Anti-Pricing requirements were only the tip of the iceberg and that soon I&#8217;ll follow my article about the declining number of US Forex brokers with another, shorter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and the Anti-Pricing requirements were only the tip of the iceberg and that soon I&#8217;ll follow my article about the declining number of US Forex brokers with another, shorter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Greenberg</title>
		<link>http://forexmagnates.com/survivor-%e2%80%9909-%e2%80%93-last-us-forex-broker-standing/#comment-4896</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Greenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 12:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forexmagnates.com/?p=364#comment-4896</guid>
		<description>Hi Linda,

Thanks for following up. I confused amifx.com with ACM (same name) who gave up on the NFA and now mostly focus on Europe and ME.

amifx.com is registered with the NFA and I will edit that in the post.

Best,
Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Linda,</p>
<p>Thanks for following up. I confused amifx.com with ACM (same name) who gave up on the NFA and now mostly focus on Europe and ME.</p>
<p>amifx.com is registered with the NFA and I will edit that in the post.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://forexmagnates.com/survivor-%e2%80%9909-%e2%80%93-last-us-forex-broker-standing/#comment-4895</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 12:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forexmagnates.com/?p=364#comment-4895</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael,

You never commented about Advanced Markets not being on the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael,</p>
<p>You never commented about Advanced Markets not being on the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Greenberg</title>
		<link>http://forexmagnates.com/survivor-%e2%80%9909-%e2%80%93-last-us-forex-broker-standing/#comment-4894</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Greenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 08:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forexmagnates.com/?p=364#comment-4894</guid>
		<description>not US regulated</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not US regulated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

